Prospective study of time to pregnancy, adverse birth outcom

The Preeclampsia Foundation does not necessarily endorse any research or news found in this forum, we just want to share what is out there. Please use your own discretion to evaluate any information you find here.
User avatar
caryn
Forum Moderator
Posts: 10203
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 06:36 am

Prospective study of time to pregnancy, adverse birth outcom

Postby caryn » Sun Mar 01, 2015 09:41 pm

"In a prospective cohort study of Danish pregnancy planners, delayed conception was a marker for adverse birth outcomes, after accounting for fertility treatment."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25707334

Greaaaaaat. Not having lots of babies starting at a young age raises risk of preeclampsia, in other words. Modern culture raises risk of preeclampsia. Goes along with this one, suggesting maternal age is also significant, raising risk roughly 3x in this population:

"Older maternal age at delivery (OR = 3.18; 95%CI: 1.31, 7.76) and higher maternal weight (OR = 3.24; 95%CI: 1.76, 5.98) measured during prenatal care were significantly associated with pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders..."

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25708493
Science! The articles you don't want to miss:
The Preeclampsia Puzzle (New Yorker) and Silent Struggle: A New Theory of Pregnancy (New York Times)
Looking for recent articles and studies?
A chance to participate in research? For us on Facebook or Twitter?

Caryn, @carynjrogers, who is not a doctor and who talks about science stuff *way* too much
DS Oscar born by emergent C-section at 34 weeks for fetal indicators, due to severe PE
DD Bridget born by C-section after water broke at 39 weeks after a healthy pregnancy

Return to “Announcements and Preeclampsia in the News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests