...The excess risk of neurodevelopmental impairment associated with male sex was higher among preeclamptic than normotensive pregnancies (p for interaction=0.004), among infants who were either small for gestational age or delivered to a mother with preeclampsia (p for interaction=0.001) and in iatrogenic as opposed to spontaneous preterm birth or preterm premature rupture of membranes (p for interaction=0.035). Interpretation: The excess risk of neurodevelopmental impairment associated with male sex among preterm infants is modulated by obstetric risk factors...
So it's not being premature per se that's most strongly associated with abnormal neurological development. It's being a boy who was delivered for preeclampsia as the result of an induction or Caesarean. We should expect to see more boys with neurodevelopmental impairment (haven't pulled the full-text, so I'm not sure how that's classed) in our population than in the average population.
Information provided on this site is provided for informational purposes only and is not meant to substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professional. You should not use the information contained herein for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disorder, or prescribing any medication. The Preeclampsia Foundation presents all data as is, without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, and is not liable for its accuracy, for mistakes or omissions of any kind, nor for any loss or damage caused by a user's reliance on information obtained on the site. Professional opinions on this condition vary greatly. The Preeclampsia Foundation endorses no one course of treatment or "cure".
The Preeclampsia Foundation does not necessarily endorse any research or news found in this forum, we just want to share what is out there. Please use your own discretion to evaluate any information you find here.
1 post • Page 1 of 1
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests