Preeclampsia Foundation Forums
Preeclampsia Foundation Forums
Home | Chat | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 About this Forum
 Announcements and Preeclampsia in the News
 Preeclampsia and risk of subsequent diabetes

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Caryn Posted - 10/26/2009 : 7:16:28 PM
Preeclampsia was associated with a higher risk of diabetes adjusting for age, primigravidity, and gestational diabetes (hazard ratio, HR 1.82, 95%CI 1.26, 2.62) and in women without gestational diabetes (n = 30,109; HR 1.86, 95%CI 1.22, 2.84).

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19843005

Great. Even if you didn't get GD, you're at almost double the risk of developing diabetes. In fact, there's hardly any difference between the two groups.

Information provided on this site is provided for informational purposes only and is not meant to substitute for the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professional. You should not use the information contained herein for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disorder, or prescribing any medication. The Preeclampsia Foundation presents all data as is, without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, and is not liable for its accuracy, for mistakes or omissions of any kind, nor for any loss or damage caused by a user's reliance on information obtained on the site. Professional opinions on this condition vary greatly. The Preeclampsia Foundation endorses no one course of treatment or "cure".
13   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
AnneS Posted - 05/07/2010 : 12:14:56 PM
BAH!
Kara Posted - 05/06/2010 : 10:59:28 PM
Ugh. And I have a family history of Type 2 diabetes. Though no GD for me.
angelr Posted - 04/23/2010 : 6:40:48 PM
I am not sure there is any way to know that everything resolves entirely at the cellular level...
It's a chicken and egg situation... did the preeclampsia do something to predispose us further or would we have just developed HD and DM anyway. With GD there is a hyperinsulinemia along with insulin resistance and we know that pancreatic beta cells can "burn out" eventually leading to Type 2 DM. So on that end I am not surprised that I have ended up here. Interestingly, everyone in my family has HD but no one has ever developed PE or diabetes on either side. So bad luck, coupled with bad genes, add preeclampsia and stir :o)
Caryn Posted - 04/23/2010 : 4:03:08 PM
Yes, that's how I understand it too, although it seems to conflict kind of a lot with the idea that the damage from preeclampsia entirely reverses after delivery!
angelr Posted - 04/23/2010 : 09:08:34 AM
Yes, diabetes is one of the known risk factors for PE. Elevated blood glucose causes endothelial damage(lining of the blood vessels)which is why diabetics are prone to micro and macro-vascular damage. The maternal manifestation of preeclampsia is widespread endothelial derangement so I suppose anything that predisposes you to this damage can only work hand in hand to make things worse on both ends :o(
But on a positive note I know someone who is a very, very "brittle" diabetic who delivered a healthy baby at age 42 with nary a sign of PE...
Rebeccac Posted - 04/22/2010 : 11:22:32 PM
So on the flip side, diabetes makes you more prone to preeclampsia (I already had (have) it)?
angelr Posted - 04/22/2010 : 10:06:22 PM
I had GD both pregnancies, PE both times. The first time (3 y ago) my blood glucoses went back to normal after delivery. This time, not so lucky. I have Type 2 DM now but still diet controlled (I am amazed how few carbs one should really be eating!) My BMI is 23, I am very active and have never been overweight. No one in my family has or had DM on either side. So I believe I am the perfect case of this phenomenon :o) Not happy about it but I can manage it.
For Faith Posted - 10/27/2009 : 7:05:33 PM
Wow, had never heard this before......have Type I and Type II in my family (but no GD for me).....guess I am destined for it.....
southerngirl108 Posted - 10/26/2009 : 10:58:39 PM
Great.....
brooklynsmom Posted - 10/26/2009 : 9:30:30 PM
Well, since I had one in each pregnancy, I guess I am really in trouble, then, hey?
Blythe Posted - 10/26/2009 : 8:41:11 PM
Did they control for BMI? Did they speculate on the correlation?

I'm just not pleased to hear this and want an alternative explanation! ;-b
missgamecock Posted - 10/26/2009 : 8:32:30 PM
That does NOT make me happy!!! Not having GD was the one thing that I passed in pregnancy!
Sonja Posted - 10/26/2009 : 8:12:11 PM
I don't even know what to say!

Preeclampsia Foundation Forums © 2000-10 Preeclampsia Foundation Go To Top Of Page
Generated in 0.3 sec. Snitz Forums 2000